Room for improvement in corporate governance of non-listed real estate funds (EU)

INREV - European Association of Investors in Non-listed Real Estate Vehicles (NL)Company

Room for improvement in corporate governance of non-listed real estate funds (EU)
Friday 11 June 2010 The non-listed real estate industry can improve standards of corporate governance, particularly transparency, accountability and alignment, according to a report from INREV.
The results of the first INREV Corporate Governance Best Practice Review showed that levels of compliance with INREV Guidelines were good but gaps in market practice showed room for improvement. "We would like to see more independent directors in funds, greater accountability of managers through more effective termination provisions, greater alignment of interest through more co-investment, better fee structures and controls over conflicts of interest, and generally better transparency, particularly side letters", said Alasdair Evans, Chairman of INREV's Corporate Governance Committee. Alignment: Some of the gaps highlighted in the report reflect issues raised as a result of the downturn, such as alignment of interest. Co-investment is an important indicator of alignment between fund managers and investors. The study showed that 19% of funds in the study did not have co-investment by the manager, the sponsor or individuals, and only 9% of funds have the management team transparently co-investing. The review also identified that funds generally have limited controls to prevent conflicts of interest with other funds run by the same manager with overlapping strategies. Stronger protection for investors is required in this area. Alignment of interest can also be demonstrated in fee structures, although there are many instances of poorly structured fees. They include base management fees calculated from gross assets encouraging managers to accumulate assets, rather than maximising performance for investors. In addition, the vast majority of performance fees are based on absolute geared performance, thereby rewarding market movements and financial engineering. Board structures: A key feature of the INREV Guidelines on corporate governance is the role of the non-executive officer. The study showed that 84% of funds have non-executive boards but they generally do not contain truly independent directors. There are many situations where independent directors are needed within funds, such as to resolve conflicts of interest issues. Accountability: Accountability of managers can be shown by investors' ability to remove the manager. The review shows that 77% of funds allow removal of the manager with cause but the barriers to implementing such a clause are high which reduces effective accountability. No-fault removal is possible in only 31% of funds and then at a high price with compensation of six to twenty four months of fees and carried interest. Transparency: Specific gaps in transparency identified were the limited ability of investors to appoint the independent auditors or the independent valuers, the limited ability for investors to call investor meetings and the very limited disclosure of side letters. "Corporate governance has rightly come under the spotlight following the financial downturn. Fund managers and investors are already addressing weaknesses highlighted by the recent market conditions in new and existing funds. This review promotes an understanding of today's issues and we expect governance in future funds to reflect improving market practice", said Andrea Carpenter, Interim CEO, INREV. The Corporate Governance Best Practice Review was undertaken for INREV by Loyens & Loeff. It examined the fund documentation of vehicles launched from 2007 to 2009 to understand their approach compared to INREV Guidelines. These funds represented 38% of the funds launched in that period in the INREV Vehicles Database. INREV issued its Corporate Governance Principles and Guidelines in December 2006 to establish common and workable standards of corporate governance for institutional non-listed European real estate funds. They now form part of the integrated INREV Guidelines released in January 2009. Source: INREV

Send to a friend

Rate

Write comment No ratings for this article

More articles of INREV - European Association of Investors in Non-listed Real Estate Vehicles

INREV updates Due Diligence Questionnaire in response to changing investor needs (NL) 28 Jul 2010
New Chairman Michael Morgenroth signals new phase for INREV (EUR) 24 Jun 2010
Room for improvement in corporate governance of non-listed real estate funds (EU) 11 Jun 2010
German institutional investors to invest €8.1 billion into non-listed property funds (DE) 10 Jun 2010
Largest ever INREV Index signals turning point for the non-listed sector (EUR) 26 Apr 2010
Fund Managers regroup as capital raising falls by 60% in 2009 (EU) 23 Apr 2010
UK institutional non-listed market to grow, especially abroad (UK) 18 Mar 2010
Illuminating non-listed property funds 26 Feb 2010
ANREV to endorse INREV guidelines in Asia as part of wider co-operation 9 Dec 2009
INREV: Fund of Funds activity falls but sector looks forward to new opportunities (EUR) 7 Dec 2009
Show all articles »

More News

INREV Director to support ANREV on secondment (NL) 3 Sep 2010
ING REIM appoints Bruno Cohen Chief Investment Officer France (FR/NL) 2 Sep 2010
ING to sell its stake in Canadian property portfolio (NL/CA) 31 Aug 2010
Foruminvest sells a majority stake in its Belgian projects (BE/NL) 30 Aug 2010
Bas Kortmann to step down from SNS REAAL Supervisory Board (NL) 26 Aug 2010
Heijmans: Profit at lower revenue levels (NL) 23 Aug 2010
Western European warehouses will see 5% take up as GDP growth is forecast (EU) 19 Aug 2010
Management changes at REDEVCO (NL/TR) 18 Aug 2010
Market expresses confidence in Western European logistics sector (EU) 13 Aug 2010
Savills: Strong recovery for Netherlands office demand (NL) 13 Aug 2010
Show all news »

Related companies, people, projects

No relations found

Articles in related categories

Federation & Association